Talk:Agarttha

From Ghyll
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(There is one inline, actually...)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
:In this case, the existing entry is Occultologists, inline. The scholar just forgot to link it in his '''Citations''' line. --[[User:MorbusIff|Morbus Iff]] 21:11, 18 May 2005 (EDT)
 
:In this case, the existing entry is Occultologists, inline. The scholar just forgot to link it in his '''Citations''' line. --[[User:MorbusIff|Morbus Iff]] 21:11, 18 May 2005 (EDT)
 +
 +
Oy vey.  I've made a muddle of this one.  I do know my genitive case from my contraction, on my best days at least.  That's what I get for rushing it.  Sin in haste, repent at leisure, I guess.
 +
--[[User:Snafu Bohica|Snafu Bohica]] 10:18, 19 May 2005 (EDT)

Revision as of 10:18, 19 May 2005

From the FAQ:

Each turn after the first, you're required to cite two phantom entries (which may be existing phantoms, brand new phantoms, or a mixture of both) and one existing entry.

Emphasis mine. As of right now there are only two phantom entries and no existing entry. --Lisa B. Underhalh 20:35, 18 May 2005 (EDT)

In this case, the existing entry is Occultologists, inline. The scholar just forgot to link it in his Citations line. --Morbus Iff 21:11, 18 May 2005 (EDT)

Oy vey. I've made a muddle of this one. I do know my genitive case from my contraction, on my best days at least. That's what I get for rushing it. Sin in haste, repent at leisure, I guess. --Snafu Bohica 10:18, 19 May 2005 (EDT)

Personal tools