Talk:Aquentravalkeration - Revision history

Jcowan: Fixing my name

2005-06-12T03:23:56Z

Fixing my name

Jcowan: Wikipedia-fying

2005-04-24T02:06:16Z

Wikipedia-fying

Jcowan at 12:50, 30 September 2004

2004-09-30T12:50:06Z

New page

My intention in writing this piece was to say as little as possible about what ''is'' known about aquentravalkeration, instead getting caught up in the "X says this, but Y says that" formula, something of a parody of Wikipedia's Neutral-Point-Of-View orthodoxy (which in its context I fully support) as well as modern journalism in general. --[[User:Jcowan|Jcowan]] 08:50, 30 Sep 2004 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:23, 12 June 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	My intention in writing this piece was to say as little as possible about what ''is'' known about aquentravalkeration, instead getting caught up in the "X says this, but Y says that" formula, something of a parody of [[Wikipedia:NPOV\|Wikipedia's Neutral-Point-Of-View]] orthodoxy (which in its context I fully support) as well as modern journalism in general. --[[User:Jcowan\|~~Jcowan~~]] 08:50, 30 Sep 2004 (EDT)	+	My intention in writing this piece was to say as little as possible about what ''is'' known about aquentravalkeration, instead getting caught up in the "X says this, but Y says that" formula, something of a parody of [[Wikipedia:NPOV\|Wikipedia's Neutral-Point-Of-View]] orthodoxy (which in its context I fully support) as well as modern journalism in general. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 08:50, 30 Sep 2004 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:06, 24 April 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	My intention in writing this piece was to say as little as possible about what ''is'' known about aquentravalkeration, instead getting caught up in the "X says this, but Y says that" formula, something of a parody of Wikipedia's Neutral-Point-Of-View orthodoxy (which in its context I fully support) as well as modern journalism in general. --[[User:Jcowan\|Jcowan]] 08:50, 30 Sep 2004 (EDT)	+	My intention in writing this piece was to say as little as possible about what ''is'' known about aquentravalkeration, instead getting caught up in the "X says this, but Y says that" formula, something of a parody of [[Wikipedia:NPOV\|Wikipedia's Neutral-Point-Of-View]] orthodoxy (which in its context I fully support) as well as modern journalism in general. --[[User:Jcowan\|Jcowan]] 08:50, 30 Sep 2004 (EDT)