Talk:Howzingery

From Ghyll
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Organization has been around for awhile already.)
(I see where you're coming from, though.)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
::Organization has been a phantom for a number of turns now. I'm fine with it. --[[User:MorbusIff|Morbus Iff]] 09:14, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT)
 
::Organization has been a phantom for a number of turns now. I'm fine with it. --[[User:MorbusIff|Morbus Iff]] 09:14, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Yeah, if I phantomed the whole name, I'd be making a new phantom. I've already done that in this article, and I like the name "Ungerry-Tubers". --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 22:17, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:17, 8 July 2005

All good now. The new pre-existing phantom is "Organization", since it was so easy to find a way to relate that to the article. Ran-wossname's papers have been forwarded in time, and everything should be as it should be. --Dfaran L'Eniarc 20:54, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)

Ranwossname! Yes! Let's go with that! --Sean B. Palmer 20:58, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
Um, might I suggest you phantom that whole name, not just Organization? Because there are a lot of articles which have the word Organization in them and I doubt that this organization is related to all of them, unless you are either (a) trying to start a conspiracy or (b) hoping that someone will define Organization... --Trousle Undrhil 23:12, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
Organization has been a phantom for a number of turns now. I'm fine with it. --Morbus Iff 09:14, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT)
Yeah, if I phantomed the whole name, I'd be making a new phantom. I've already done that in this article, and I like the name "Ungerry-Tubers". --Dfaran L'Eniarc 22:17, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT)
Personal tools