Talk:Howzingery - Revision history

Jcowan: Resolving obsolete talk

2005-07-10T01:28:37Z

Resolving obsolete talk

Undrhil: * Okie dokey then *

2005-07-09T05:30:40Z

* Okie dokey then *

Dfaran L'Eniarc: I see where you're coming from, though.

2005-07-09T02:17:29Z

I see where you're coming from, though.

Morbus Iff: Organization has been around for awhile already.

2005-07-08T13:14:22Z

Organization has been around for awhile already.

Undrhil at 03:12, 8 July 2005

2005-07-08T03:12:42Z

Undrhil: * Phantom Organization? Um, that seems so ... generic ... anyone else agree? *

2005-07-08T03:12:26Z

* Phantom Organization? Um, that seems so ... generic ... anyone else agree? *

Sbp: Awesome invention.

2005-07-08T00:58:50Z

Awesome invention.

Dfaran L'Eniarc: Everything's fixed

2005-07-08T00:54:33Z

Everything's fixed

Dfaran L'Eniarc: Well, that explains it.

2005-07-08T00:42:29Z

Well, that explains it.

Undrhil: * Comment *

2005-07-08T00:07:41Z

* Comment *

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-All good now. The new pre-existing phantom is "Organization", since it was so easy to find a way to relate that to the article. Ran-wossname's papers have been forwarded in time, and everything should be as it should be. --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 20:54, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
+{{ResolvedTalk}}
-−
-:Ranwossname! Yes! Let's go with that! --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 20:58, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
-−
-:Um, might I suggest you phantom that whole name, not just Organization?  Because there are a lot of articles which have the word Organization in them and I doubt that this organization is related to all of them, unless you are either (a) trying to start a conspiracy or (b) hoping that someone will define Organization... --[[User:Undrhil|Trousle Undrhil]] 23:12, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
-−
-::Organization has been a phantom for a number of turns now. I'm fine with it. --[[User:MorbusIff|Morbus Iff]] 09:14, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT)
-−
-:::It had?  Wow.  I'm not very observant, apparently.  :) --[[User:Undrhil|Trousle Undrhil]] 01:30, 9 Jul 2005 (EDT)
-−
-::Yeah, if I phantomed the whole name, I'd be making a new phantom. I've already done that in this article, and I like the name "Ungerry-Tubers". --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 22:17, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:30, 9 July 2005
Line 6:		Line 6:

	::Organization has been a phantom for a number of turns now. I'm fine with it. --[[User:MorbusIff\|Morbus Iff]] 09:14, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT)		::Organization has been a phantom for a number of turns now. I'm fine with it. --[[User:MorbusIff\|Morbus Iff]] 09:14, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	:::It had? Wow. I'm not very observant, apparently. :) --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 01:30, 9 Jul 2005 (EDT)

	::Yeah, if I phantomed the whole name, I'd be making a new phantom. I've already done that in this article, and I like the name "Ungerry-Tubers". --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc\|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 22:17, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT)		::Yeah, if I phantomed the whole name, I'd be making a new phantom. I've already done that in this article, and I like the name "Ungerry-Tubers". --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc\|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 22:17, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:17, 9 July 2005
Line 6:		Line 6:

	::Organization has been a phantom for a number of turns now. I'm fine with it. --[[User:MorbusIff\|Morbus Iff]] 09:14, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT)		::Organization has been a phantom for a number of turns now. I'm fine with it. --[[User:MorbusIff\|Morbus Iff]] 09:14, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	::Yeah, if I phantomed the whole name, I'd be making a new phantom. I've already done that in this article, and I like the name "Ungerry-Tubers". --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc\|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 22:17, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:14, 8 July 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	I really think it's too confusing to have both a Rancticircheretic and a [[Rancticirchiretic]] in the same Ghyll, as a matter of gaming etiquette. Please pick another name. And if you in fact meant the latter, he was born in -76 [[EC]] and can't have filed a report two centuries ago. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 13:38, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
−
−	:Based on his adding of Ranc back to the Phantoms, it appears he DOES want to use YOUR Ranc, not a new person. He should a) remove the incorrect spelling (including phantom), b) pick a new phantom to meet his official citations requirement, and c) reconcile the "two centuries ago" fact. --[[User:MorbusIff\|Morbus Iff]] 14:02, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
−
−	:To further make matters confusing, [[Lord Glosfordshier]], a Jcowan entry, includes the incorrectly spelled version AND suggests he was from two centuries ago, probably where Dfaran is getting that little tip from. Jcowan: any opinions on how to fix this one? --[[User:MorbusIff\|Morbus Iff]] 14:04, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
−
−	::Actually, it's not that bad. The documents of Glosfordshier were "hithertho suppressed", which doesn't place Ranc in that time period, merely that his work, recent or otherwise, is now invalid due to newly available information that originated from that period. So, in my quick five minute checking, we should be just back to fixing the "two centuries ago" fact in Howzingery. --[[User:MorbusIff\|Morbus Iff]] 14:07, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
−
−	Dfaran: I've removed the bum phantom and fixed the mispelling of Rancticirchiretic everywhere. Just gotta reconcile the "two centuries ago" fact and pick a replacement phantom. --[[User:MorbusIff\|Morbus Iff]] 14:10, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
−
−	:I vote that we rename him Rantychattyheretic, since that's what I tend to call him when pronouncing the name--notwithstanding the fact that (my own) [[Rancticirchiretic]] article says "rannik", which is even easier. --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 19:27, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
−
−	::I vote that we abolish long, hard-to-pronounce names, period. I mean, who comes up with this stuff? Don't they have better things to be doing? <grin> --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 20:07, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
−
−	~~I thought it a bit odd that a phantom had been left out for so long like that... Oy, back to the editing screen, then. --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc\|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 20:42, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)~~
−
	All good now. The new pre-existing phantom is "Organization", since it was so easy to find a way to relate that to the article. Ran-wossname's papers have been forwarded in time, and everything should be as it should be. --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc\|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 20:54, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)		All good now. The new pre-existing phantom is "Organization", since it was so easy to find a way to relate that to the article. Ran-wossname's papers have been forwarded in time, and everything should be as it should be. --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc\|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 20:54, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)

Line 20:		Line 4:

	:Um, might I suggest you phantom that whole name, not just Organization? Because there are a lot of articles which have the word Organization in them and I doubt that this organization is related to all of them, unless you are either (a) trying to start a conspiracy or (b) hoping that someone will define Organization... --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 23:12, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)		:Um, might I suggest you phantom that whole name, not just Organization? Because there are a lot of articles which have the word Organization in them and I doubt that this organization is related to all of them, unless you are either (a) trying to start a conspiracy or (b) hoping that someone will define Organization... --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 23:12, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	::Organization has been a phantom for a number of turns now. I'm fine with it. --[[User:MorbusIff\|Morbus Iff]] 09:14, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:12, 8 July 2005
Line 18:		Line 18:

	:Ranwossname! Yes! Let's go with that! --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 20:58, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)		:Ranwossname! Yes! Let's go with that! --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 20:58, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
		+
	:Um, might I suggest you phantom that whole name, not just Organization? Because there are a lot of articles which have the word Organization in them and I doubt that this organization is related to all of them, unless you are either (a) trying to start a conspiracy or (b) hoping that someone will define Organization... --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 23:12, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)		:Um, might I suggest you phantom that whole name, not just Organization? Because there are a lot of articles which have the word Organization in them and I doubt that this organization is related to all of them, unless you are either (a) trying to start a conspiracy or (b) hoping that someone will define Organization... --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 23:12, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:58, 8 July 2005
Line 16:		Line 16:

	All good now. The new pre-existing phantom is "Organization", since it was so easy to find a way to relate that to the article. Ran-wossname's papers have been forwarded in time, and everything should be as it should be. --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc\|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 20:54, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)		All good now. The new pre-existing phantom is "Organization", since it was so easy to find a way to relate that to the article. Ran-wossname's papers have been forwarded in time, and everything should be as it should be. --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc\|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 20:54, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	:Ranwossname! Yes! Let's go with that! --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 20:58, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:54, 8 July 2005
Line 14:		Line 14:

	I thought it a bit odd that a phantom had been left out for so long like that... Oy, back to the editing screen, then. --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc\|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 20:42, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)		I thought it a bit odd that a phantom had been left out for so long like that... Oy, back to the editing screen, then. --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc\|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 20:42, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	All good now. The new pre-existing phantom is "Organization", since it was so easy to find a way to relate that to the article. Ran-wossname's papers have been forwarded in time, and everything should be as it should be. --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc\|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 20:54, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:42, 8 July 2005
Line 12:		Line 12:

	::I vote that we abolish long, hard-to-pronounce names, period. I mean, who comes up with this stuff? Don't they have better things to be doing? <grin> --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 20:07, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)		::I vote that we abolish long, hard-to-pronounce names, period. I mean, who comes up with this stuff? Don't they have better things to be doing? <grin> --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 20:07, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	I thought it a bit odd that a phantom had been left out for so long like that... Oy, back to the editing screen, then. --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc\|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 20:42, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:07, 8 July 2005
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:I vote that we rename him Rantychattyheretic, since that's what I tend to call him when pronouncing the name--notwithstanding the fact that (my own) [[Rancticirchiretic]] article says "rannik", which is even easier. --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 19:27, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)		:I vote that we rename him Rantychattyheretic, since that's what I tend to call him when pronouncing the name--notwithstanding the fact that (my own) [[Rancticirchiretic]] article says "rannik", which is even easier. --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 19:27, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	::I vote that we abolish long, hard-to-pronounce names, period. I mean, who comes up with this stuff? Don't they have better things to be doing? <grin> --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 20:07, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)